by scramasax57 » Sat Jul 08, 2006 1:17 pm
I've always found it a little ubelievable that all Asian martial arts "came from" Chinese martial arts. I find it more likely that other countries, especially Japan with its long history of feudal warfare, developed their own martial arts and then integrated techniques and ideas from CMA. China certainly was a cultural and technological center of Asia, which would explain why China has/had many more seperate schools and "styles" of martial arts and why these styles had more regimented training methods and complex histories/philosophies. I think the "comprehensiveness" issue arises when people take something like Judo and say that it only does grappling so it's not complete or well-rounded. The problem with that is a) Judo is the sport version of Jujitsu, and sport martial arts are never as effective as the originals, and b) Judo is not meant to stand alone. The traditional Japanese martial artist would not just study Jujitsu, he would also study Karate and/or other striking disciplines. Jujitsu is more equal to Qin Na in that it should be seen more as a subcategory of martial arts, one area of study, rather than an independent style.
aka eric hinds, 2nd stripe
n. andover, ma branch
yang's martial arts association
changchuan, baihe, and xingyi