after I provided your original statement that was in response to one of mine. There was no 'mash up' as you call it. I merely quoted what I had said and how you had responded. If you look at your own post from which it came you will see this quite clearly.feel free to mash my quotes up with yours, ignore any substantive point I have, and focus on the cracks - you are not interested in what I have to say, are you.
I'm grasping because it appears that nobody with true ability seems to have been tested by Monsoon-approved testers with the correct Qi Gong® certified equipment?
Oh really? So the eyes that most people possess and use every day are now "Qi Gong® certified equipment"? Give me a break. I have repeatedly said that these phenomenon could be examined under the SIMPLEST of conditions and the mere observation of an overt event would most likely indicate a positive result. No extra equipment required. No special testers. Just transparency from beginning to end. Hell, I'll stand back and watch you lot run the whole thing, but it has to be transparent. No takers? Nah, thought not.
Incidentally did you notice this bit right here "... at the risk of being rude..."? This is a clear signal that I am aware of the potential of being accused of an ad hominem approach, and that I am making it clear that the following statement is actually a serious inquiry. Asking if someone has any professional experience is not an attack on the person, just a request for clarification.
I'm grasping because it appears that nobody with true ability seems to have been tested by Monsoon-approved testers with the correct Qi Gong® certified equipment?
Actually, you will find, if you bother to read around a bit, that nobody with true ability has EVER been tested under PROPERLY CONTROLLED CONDITIONS. It's nothing to do with me.
Show me one test under normal scientifically acceptable conditions that has demonstrated a positive result. Not MY conditions, but those set out by the scientific and academic community... but wait, of course, these science people are all in the conspiracy together /slaps forehead/ how could I forget.
I am interested in what you have to say, but you haven't said anything that hasn't been dismissed a zillion times by reputable people over the last 50 years (conservatively).
As to your substantive points... perhaps you would do me the kindness of pointing them out, because I am unable to discern which ones they are (I am quite serious about this).